<TD></TD></TABLE>
thinkoflawasan
abstractentity,butasaflexiblequantityasitshouldbepersonallyappliedtolonel
huangorjorliacrdingly,anylapersonalenoughtorespondto
thepersonalityoflonelhuangorjorliisinhunandthereforenolaall
chinesejusticeisanart,notascience
1thisrefers,ofurse,togeneralanhoodasbroughtaboutbythepresentsocial
syste
jespersen,inhishandstructureofenglish,once
referredtothesculinequalitiesoftheenglishlanguagebypointingtoitsloveof
eno,nsenseandforcefulnesshoutontradictsogreatan
authorityojitheenglishlanguage,ibegtodifferonapointhesexes
nsenseandthepracticalndarecharacteristicsofenratherthanof
n,oreliabletotaketheirfeetoffthegroundandsoartoiossible
heightsthechineselanguageandgraarshoininityexactlybecausethe
language,initsforsyntaxandvocabulary,revealsanextresilicityof
thinking,nageryandenoofsyntacticalrelationships
thissilicityisbestillustratedfroidgin,eathchinese
bones,ase,youno
e;youe,henoe”shouldnotbensideredasclearasthere
roundabout”youneednte,ifhees,andheneednte,ifyoue”in
faoon,indeansenglish,quotes
anenglishsorsetfarrastestifyingbeforethejudge:”hedastick,andheda
stick,andhelickedhe,andhelickedhe;ifhelickedheashardashelickedhe,heda
killedhe,andnothehe,”andthisseetoachresensiblealking
thanoneaniccasedistinctionsforacrdingtothechinese,the
differencebetplex,andtheaddingofthethirdpersonsingularending”s”
isassuperfluousasisalreadyprovedtobeinthepasttenseihad,hehad;i,he
things”houtever
beingsunderstoodorlosinganythingexceptaaningless”class”hhas
nothingtodohthebeautyofexpressionihavegreathopethatenglishand
aricanprofessorsablypronouncea”hedont”in
thesandthattheenglishlanguageyonedaybeeassensibleand
clearasthechinese,throughtheinfluenceofpidgin
acertainfeninepracticalinstincthasalreadyguidedtheenglishtoabbreviateall
theirsubordinateclausesaschaspossible,like”itting5”god
ed”ifidontnotshallnot
ebacktonightand”ifnotshallbreakoutnextweek”
jespersenalreadyntionssuplicityinenglishas”first
e,firstserved”nocure,nopay,””oncebitten,tandard
pidgintheyarebeginningtodropthe”,”too”o”
englishgraaristhereforenotfarfroalvationtheplicityis,
hoountainety”othe
chineseclearlyansthat”ifyouonlysitandeatanddonothing,evenafortuneas
bigasauntaiibeforetheenglishcan
catchuphus
thechinesencretehinkingcanalsobeillustratedbythenatureofits
abstraetaphoricexpressionsanabstract
notionisoftenexpressedbythebinationoftall”
for”size,””longshort”for”length,””broadnarroh””isthe
bigsllofyourshoes””long”and”short”alsorefertotherightandwrongof
partiesindispute,asthechineseexpressionisentislongor
short”andthereforeilar
totheenglish”thelongandtheshortofitis”and”thatnhasnorightwrong”
aningheisagoodnbecausehepreservesagodlikeindifferencetowardall
questions,anddoesnotgetinvolvedinprivatedisputesabstractendingslike”ness”
arealsounknoplysay,encius,that”the
eastheeofaejade”thishasabearing
ontheirlackoianalyticthinking
en,sofarasiknosthis,ithink,hasbeenprovedby
ananalyticalstudyofthevocabularyofenauthorstheanalytical,statistical
thouch
nsensetogotothetroubleofuntingoproveithe
truthdirectlythatensvocabularyinspeechandingisdecidedlylessabstract,
thatissuffiageryalways
takestheplainologythehighlyacadecsentence:”thereisno
differencebutdifferenceofdegreebetdegreesofdifferenceandnodifferenccannotbeexactlyreproducedinchinese,andachinesetranslatorwould
probablysubstituteforitthencianquestion:”isthedifferencebetween
runningaystepsandrunningaepsinbattle”sucha
substituteexpressionlosesindefinitionandexactness,butgainsinintelligibilityto
say,”hoentalprocesses”isnotsointelligibleas”how
uldiknoind”,andthisintuisdecidedlyless
affectivethanthechinese”aatapeinhisbelly”
chinesethought,therefore,alainsontheperipheryofthevisibleworld,and
thishelpsasenseoffactthis
dislikeofabstractterisfurtherseeninthechinesenasforclassificationsh
usuallyrequiresharplydefinedterinstead,thechinesealost
expressivenasfordifferentthereare
differentthodsofethodofchingafireacrossth
... </P></TD>
thinkoflawasan
abstractentity,butasaflexiblequantityasitshouldbepersonallyappliedtolonel
huangorjorliacrdingly,anylapersonalenoughtorespondto
thepersonalityoflonelhuangorjorliisinhunandthereforenolaall
chinesejusticeisanart,notascience
1thisrefers,ofurse,togeneralanhoodasbroughtaboutbythepresentsocial
syste
jespersen,inhishandstructureofenglish,once
referredtothesculinequalitiesoftheenglishlanguagebypointingtoitsloveof
eno,nsenseandforcefulnesshoutontradictsogreatan
authorityojitheenglishlanguage,ibegtodifferonapointhesexes
nsenseandthepracticalndarecharacteristicsofenratherthanof
n,oreliabletotaketheirfeetoffthegroundandsoartoiossible
heightsthechineselanguageandgraarshoininityexactlybecausethe
language,initsforsyntaxandvocabulary,revealsanextresilicityof
thinking,nageryandenoofsyntacticalrelationships
thissilicityisbestillustratedfroidgin,eathchinese
bones,ase,youno
e;youe,henoe”shouldnotbensideredasclearasthere
roundabout”youneednte,ifhees,andheneednte,ifyoue”in
faoon,indeansenglish,quotes
anenglishsorsetfarrastestifyingbeforethejudge:”hedastick,andheda
stick,andhelickedhe,andhelickedhe;ifhelickedheashardashelickedhe,heda
killedhe,andnothehe,”andthisseetoachresensiblealking
thanoneaniccasedistinctionsforacrdingtothechinese,the
differencebetplex,andtheaddingofthethirdpersonsingularending”s”
isassuperfluousasisalreadyprovedtobeinthepasttenseihad,hehad;i,he
things”houtever
beingsunderstoodorlosinganythingexceptaaningless”class”hhas
nothingtodohthebeautyofexpressionihavegreathopethatenglishand
aricanprofessorsablypronouncea”hedont”in
thesandthattheenglishlanguageyonedaybeeassensibleand
clearasthechinese,throughtheinfluenceofpidgin
acertainfeninepracticalinstincthasalreadyguidedtheenglishtoabbreviateall
theirsubordinateclausesaschaspossible,like”itting5”god
ed”ifidontnotshallnot
ebacktonightand”ifnotshallbreakoutnextweek”
jespersenalreadyntionssuplicityinenglishas”first
e,firstserved”nocure,nopay,””oncebitten,tandard
pidgintheyarebeginningtodropthe”,”too”o”
englishgraaristhereforenotfarfroalvationtheplicityis,
hoountainety”othe
chineseclearlyansthat”ifyouonlysitandeatanddonothing,evenafortuneas
bigasauntaiibeforetheenglishcan
catchuphus
thechinesencretehinkingcanalsobeillustratedbythenatureofits
abstraetaphoricexpressionsanabstract
notionisoftenexpressedbythebinationoftall”
for”size,””longshort”for”length,””broadnarroh””isthe
bigsllofyourshoes””long”and”short”alsorefertotherightandwrongof
partiesindispute,asthechineseexpressionisentislongor
short”andthereforeilar
totheenglish”thelongandtheshortofitis”and”thatnhasnorightwrong”
aningheisagoodnbecausehepreservesagodlikeindifferencetowardall
questions,anddoesnotgetinvolvedinprivatedisputesabstractendingslike”ness”
arealsounknoplysay,encius,that”the
eastheeofaejade”thishasabearing
ontheirlackoianalyticthinking
en,sofarasiknosthis,ithink,hasbeenprovedby
ananalyticalstudyofthevocabularyofenauthorstheanalytical,statistical
thouch
nsensetogotothetroubleofuntingoproveithe
truthdirectlythatensvocabularyinspeechandingisdecidedlylessabstract,
thatissuffiageryalways
takestheplainologythehighlyacadecsentence:”thereisno
differencebutdifferenceofdegreebetdegreesofdifferenceandnodifferenccannotbeexactlyreproducedinchinese,andachinesetranslatorwould
probablysubstituteforitthencianquestion:”isthedifferencebetween
runningaystepsandrunningaepsinbattle”sucha
substituteexpressionlosesindefinitionandexactness,butgainsinintelligibilityto
say,”hoentalprocesses”isnotsointelligibleas”how
uldiknoind”,andthisintuisdecidedlyless
affectivethanthechinese”aatapeinhisbelly”
chinesethought,therefore,alainsontheperipheryofthevisibleworld,and
thishelpsasenseoffactthis
dislikeofabstractterisfurtherseeninthechinesenasforclassificationsh
usuallyrequiresharplydefinedterinstead,thechinesealost
expressivenasfordifferentthereare
differentthodsofethodofchingafireacrossth
... </P></TD>