<TD></TD></TABLE>
universityof
akinga”parativestudy”oftheiressionalpowerof
varioustypesoflettering,foundthattheblackerthelines,therestrikingtheyare
totheeye
thissortofstupidity,althoughusefultobusinessadvertisent,uldreallybe
arrivedat,ithink,justasrreonsenseand
”intuition”thebestcartoonihaveeverseeninpunchisthatofangressof
behaviouristsberofpig”subjects”throughatest,ha
therterinthesnoutandapearlneouslyresolve
thatpigsdonotrespondtothesightofjeerely
prostitutionofthescientificthod,forhatprofessorcasonofrochester
universityreadapaperattheninthannualinteationalnferenceofpsychologists
onthe”originandnatureofnannoyances,”ined21,000
kindsofannoyances,erdeductingduplicationsand”spuriousannoyances,”
erreducedto507,andinhese
”annoyances,”like26rksfor”hairinfood,”2for”thesightofabaldhead”and24
for”ckroaches”
1teachersllegererd,luiauniversity,feb,1930,p472,quotedby
abrahalexner:universities,arican,englishandge
sflexner,ibid”adissertationsubttedtothegraduatefacultyincandidacyfor
degreeofsterofarts,”universityofchicago
8flexner,ibid”adissertationsubttedinpartialfulfilntoftherequirentsof
kansasstateagriculturalllegefordegreeofdoctoroiscience”
acertainauntofstupiddrudgeryisofursepartandparceloftruescientific
ruescientificdisciplinecanenableascientisttotakedelightinthe
disverythatanearthhasacertainprotectivevering,foritisonthe
ainutelyobservedfactsthatsciencegregenerationto
generationtoitspresentgnificentattainntshoutthatscientifiutlook,and
ourandnsense,thechinesestnecessarilynsiderthestudyandobservationofthelifeofanearthorofagoldfishas
beneaththedignityofascholar
ivlogic
thisbringsustotheproblefchineselogic,hechinese
nceptionoftruthtruth,acrdingtochinese,canneverbeproved:itcanonlybe
suggestedchuangtselongagopointedoutthesubjectivityofknowledgeinhis
ckiwulun:
inanarguntbete,youthinkyouhavegotthebetterof,andi
ityoursuperioritythenareyoureallyright,andireallyhinki
havegotthebetterofyouandyouitsuperiority梩henareally
rightandyoureallyhright,orperhapsareh
knohusircledindarkness,andwhois
goingtoestablishthetruthifanhyouestabli**,thenhe
alreadyagreeshyou,sohoabli**ifoneh
establishthetruth,thenhealreadyagreese,sohoabli**if
onehbothofusestablishthetruth,thenhealreadydisagrees
hbothofus,sohoabli**ifonehbothofus
establishthetruth,thenhealreadyagreeshbothofus,sohoabli**
thusyouandiandotherpeoplecannotknohetruth,andhoforthe
otherone
acrdingtothistheoryofknoaybe
graspedbythendina”dialectichoutseone”knoisso
anner
of,”itcanthereforebefeltonlybyasortofintuitiveperceptionthechinese,hout
allnsology,essentiallyagreehit
insteadofrelyingonlogic,heyrelyonthe
perhapshealthiesenseanythinglikegentreasoningisunknownin
chineseliterature,forthechineseinherentlydisbelieveinitnsequentlyno
dialeisunknown
behardkarlgrenrecentlyanyargunts
usedbychinese”highercritics”inprovingthegenuinenessorspuriousnessofancient
eofthestakesreallyseeoafterthe
applicationoftheethodachineseneveresatreatiseoftenthousand,
orevenfivethousand,oestablishapointheputsdoeaboutit,
leavingittobesustainedordisprovedbyposterityonitsintrinsicritthatiswhy
chinesescholarsalanyllectionsof”notebooks,”called
shuipiorpichi,nsistingofunclassifiedparagraphs,inhe
authorshipofliteraryixedupesetsandsketchesofaredbeardedheroora
centipedeeatingrecluse
achineseauthorpresentsyouentsandthenstateshis
n,youseldoirseehirrivingatthenclusion,forthe
arguntsancevidencesareneverlong,butyouseeinaflashthathealreadyhasit
thebestofsuchnotebooks,likethejihchihluofkiyenhe
seventeenthcentury,establishtheireputation,notbytheirlogicbutbytheessential
rreents,erity
theetistheresultofyears
ofresearinationofasinglpointof
historicfactghthaveinvolvedrepeatedtripsandanencyclopaedicerudition,but
hiserrorsarediffidiately
visible,andcanonlybeappreciatedbecauseno
hasbeenabletoestablishapointagainsthi
thusnsense,akestheplaceof
induonsenseisoftensanerbecausethe
analyticreasoninglook
... </P></TD>
universityof
akinga”parativestudy”oftheiressionalpowerof
varioustypesoflettering,foundthattheblackerthelines,therestrikingtheyare
totheeye
thissortofstupidity,althoughusefultobusinessadvertisent,uldreallybe
arrivedat,ithink,justasrreonsenseand
”intuition”thebestcartoonihaveeverseeninpunchisthatofangressof
behaviouristsberofpig”subjects”throughatest,ha
therterinthesnoutandapearlneouslyresolve
thatpigsdonotrespondtothesightofjeerely
prostitutionofthescientificthod,forhatprofessorcasonofrochester
universityreadapaperattheninthannualinteationalnferenceofpsychologists
onthe”originandnatureofnannoyances,”ined21,000
kindsofannoyances,erdeductingduplicationsand”spuriousannoyances,”
erreducedto507,andinhese
”annoyances,”like26rksfor”hairinfood,”2for”thesightofabaldhead”and24
for”ckroaches”
1teachersllegererd,luiauniversity,feb,1930,p472,quotedby
abrahalexner:universities,arican,englishandge
sflexner,ibid”adissertationsubttedtothegraduatefacultyincandidacyfor
degreeofsterofarts,”universityofchicago
8flexner,ibid”adissertationsubttedinpartialfulfilntoftherequirentsof
kansasstateagriculturalllegefordegreeofdoctoroiscience”
acertainauntofstupiddrudgeryisofursepartandparceloftruescientific
ruescientificdisciplinecanenableascientisttotakedelightinthe
disverythatanearthhasacertainprotectivevering,foritisonthe
ainutelyobservedfactsthatsciencegregenerationto
generationtoitspresentgnificentattainntshoutthatscientifiutlook,and
ourandnsense,thechinesestnecessarilynsiderthestudyandobservationofthelifeofanearthorofagoldfishas
beneaththedignityofascholar
ivlogic
thisbringsustotheproblefchineselogic,hechinese
nceptionoftruthtruth,acrdingtochinese,canneverbeproved:itcanonlybe
suggestedchuangtselongagopointedoutthesubjectivityofknowledgeinhis
ckiwulun:
inanarguntbete,youthinkyouhavegotthebetterof,andi
ityoursuperioritythenareyoureallyright,andireallyhinki
havegotthebetterofyouandyouitsuperiority梩henareally
rightandyoureallyhright,orperhapsareh
knohusircledindarkness,andwhois
goingtoestablishthetruthifanhyouestabli**,thenhe
alreadyagreeshyou,sohoabli**ifoneh
establishthetruth,thenhealreadyagreese,sohoabli**if
onehbothofusestablishthetruth,thenhealreadydisagrees
hbothofus,sohoabli**ifonehbothofus
establishthetruth,thenhealreadyagreeshbothofus,sohoabli**
thusyouandiandotherpeoplecannotknohetruth,andhoforthe
otherone
acrdingtothistheoryofknoaybe
graspedbythendina”dialectichoutseone”knoisso
anner
of,”itcanthereforebefeltonlybyasortofintuitiveperceptionthechinese,hout
allnsology,essentiallyagreehit
insteadofrelyingonlogic,heyrelyonthe
perhapshealthiesenseanythinglikegentreasoningisunknownin
chineseliterature,forthechineseinherentlydisbelieveinitnsequentlyno
dialeisunknown
behardkarlgrenrecentlyanyargunts
usedbychinese”highercritics”inprovingthegenuinenessorspuriousnessofancient
eofthestakesreallyseeoafterthe
applicationoftheethodachineseneveresatreatiseoftenthousand,
orevenfivethousand,oestablishapointheputsdoeaboutit,
leavingittobesustainedordisprovedbyposterityonitsintrinsicritthatiswhy
chinesescholarsalanyllectionsof”notebooks,”called
shuipiorpichi,nsistingofunclassifiedparagraphs,inhe
authorshipofliteraryixedupesetsandsketchesofaredbeardedheroora
centipedeeatingrecluse
achineseauthorpresentsyouentsandthenstateshis
n,youseldoirseehirrivingatthenclusion,forthe
arguntsancevidencesareneverlong,butyouseeinaflashthathealreadyhasit
thebestofsuchnotebooks,likethejihchihluofkiyenhe
seventeenthcentury,establishtheireputation,notbytheirlogicbutbytheessential
rreents,erity
theetistheresultofyears
ofresearinationofasinglpointof
historicfactghthaveinvolvedrepeatedtripsandanencyclopaedicerudition,but
hiserrorsarediffidiately
visible,andcanonlybeappreciatedbecauseno
hasbeenabletoestablishapointagainsthi
thusnsense,akestheplaceof
induonsenseisoftensanerbecausethe
analyticreasoninglook
... </P></TD>