<TD></TD></TABLE>
sketonialings,official
randu,andsostproscuousvarietyoftopics,
historiostallsuch
eeringthe
factthatnyoftheseauthorshaveelsetennsecutivetreatisesonspecial
topics,thisproscuityisperhapspardonableagainstsuchkindnsiderations,
hooftheliterary
aanyauthors,andtheonlyliteraryaost,andthattheyrepresent
tothechinese”literature”parexcellenceachineseschoolboy,incultivatingaprose
style,isdetorepeataseleodels
furthesiderthefaendousliterary
aendousnuerofsendously
literaryinent
perhapsodestandardan
elentisalanjoysandsorrohesehere
enaybeinterestedin
butbeingde,odestandardwhenonereads
kueiyukuangsbiographiother,ost
eandleaderofaliteraryvent,andreersthatthisisthehighestprodueofdevotiontoleaing,andthendisversinitonlya
purelylinguisticcraftsnshipinitatingtheancients,laidoverapaucityof
ent,onehasarighttobe
disappointed
goodprosethereisinchineseclassicalliterature,butoneofinditfor
oneself,haneandardofvaluationherforliberationofthoughtand
sentintorforliberationofstyle,oneongaclassofslightly
unorthodox,uch
intellectualntentthattheysthavehadanaturalntetforthecarcassofstyle
suchei,liliweng,
kungtingan,allofellectualrebels,andingsher
bannedorgreatlydepreeoranothertheyhadthat
personalstyleofingorofthoughthodoxscholarsregardedasfriendlyto
radiorality
viliteratureandpolitics
itisnaturalthatthebondageoflanguagehasbroughthitthebondageofthought
theliterarylanguagehatituldnotexpressanexactthoughtit
alidstsuchgeneralities,ha
totallackofdisciplineinlogicalreasoning,chinesescholarsoftendisplayedan
extreentthisdisparitybethoughtandliterature
broughtaboutasituationhoughtandliteraturewereregardedashavingno
relationhoneanother
thisbringsustotherelationbeteratureandpoliticsinordertounderstand
chinesepolitics,oneshouldunderstandchineseliteratureperhapsoneshouldhere
avoidtheeraturetreshis
eaveritableniainthenationthisis
ents,rcial
nents,thefirstthoughtishow
toketheicesounding,hobeautifullyandthefirstthoughtofa
neentsreadnients
alstalostalbeautifullyapalpablelieis
praisedifitistoldingoodfor
thishasledtoatypeofbelleslettress
extrelysillythusinaparativelyrecentstatentbyaniortantpolitical
partyesouationalsovereigntyandinvadesourterritory,
outhepeaceofthe
ined,ost,ustunite
together”adepubliesticpoliticalsituationofthe
ntandaredetailedacuntoftheeansbyheyaregoing
to”driveout”theinvadersand”stop9thebreakersofinteationalpeacethis
literarylpraeses,asrcial
advertisentforsilkstoofalongfivehundredwordessay,
beginninganchurianprovinceshavebeenlost”
thatdoesnotan,hoplendedtheir
literatureisfullofgeneralities,butitisnotsileratheronthentrary,frohis
hedgingabouttheprobleandthesevaguegeneralitiesofexpression,therehas
developed,strangetosay,theutstfinesseofexpressionthechinese,versedin
thisliterarytraining,haveleaedtoreadbethelines,anditistheforeigners3
inabilitytoreadbetissingthe
”aningbeyondthehatcausestheforeign
rrespondentstoselvesfortheirinabilitytokeheador
tailofsuchcleverlylesspublicstatents
fortheincingwordslargelydue,aswehaveseen,
tothenosyllabiccharacteroftheliterarylanguage梐ndis
ihevictoryinapoliticalorlegal
strugglechinesecivilof
exsthepublicassiduouslyreadthisexchangeofabusivenessor
ofpoliterecrinationsorevenbrazenfacedlies,anddecideter
literarystyle,inousclo
... </P></TD>
sketonialings,official
randu,andsostproscuousvarietyoftopics,
historiostallsuch
eeringthe
factthatnyoftheseauthorshaveelsetennsecutivetreatisesonspecial
topics,thisproscuityisperhapspardonableagainstsuchkindnsiderations,
hooftheliterary
aanyauthors,andtheonlyliteraryaost,andthattheyrepresent
tothechinese”literature”parexcellenceachineseschoolboy,incultivatingaprose
style,isdetorepeataseleodels
furthesiderthefaendousliterary
aendousnuerofsendously
literaryinent
perhapsodestandardan
elentisalanjoysandsorrohesehere
enaybeinterestedin
butbeingde,odestandardwhenonereads
kueiyukuangsbiographiother,ost
eandleaderofaliteraryvent,andreersthatthisisthehighestprodueofdevotiontoleaing,andthendisversinitonlya
purelylinguisticcraftsnshipinitatingtheancients,laidoverapaucityof
ent,onehasarighttobe
disappointed
goodprosethereisinchineseclassicalliterature,butoneofinditfor
oneself,haneandardofvaluationherforliberationofthoughtand
sentintorforliberationofstyle,oneongaclassofslightly
unorthodox,uch
intellectualntentthattheysthavehadanaturalntetforthecarcassofstyle
suchei,liliweng,
kungtingan,allofellectualrebels,andingsher
bannedorgreatlydepreeoranothertheyhadthat
personalstyleofingorofthoughthodoxscholarsregardedasfriendlyto
radiorality
viliteratureandpolitics
itisnaturalthatthebondageoflanguagehasbroughthitthebondageofthought
theliterarylanguagehatituldnotexpressanexactthoughtit
alidstsuchgeneralities,ha
totallackofdisciplineinlogicalreasoning,chinesescholarsoftendisplayedan
extreentthisdisparitybethoughtandliterature
broughtaboutasituationhoughtandliteraturewereregardedashavingno
relationhoneanother
thisbringsustotherelationbeteratureandpoliticsinordertounderstand
chinesepolitics,oneshouldunderstandchineseliteratureperhapsoneshouldhere
avoidtheeraturetreshis
eaveritableniainthenationthisis
ents,rcial
nents,thefirstthoughtishow
toketheicesounding,hobeautifullyandthefirstthoughtofa
neentsreadnients
alstalostalbeautifullyapalpablelieis
praisedifitistoldingoodfor
thishasledtoatypeofbelleslettress
extrelysillythusinaparativelyrecentstatentbyaniortantpolitical
partyesouationalsovereigntyandinvadesourterritory,
outhepeaceofthe
ined,ost,ustunite
together”adepubliesticpoliticalsituationofthe
ntandaredetailedacuntoftheeansbyheyaregoing
to”driveout”theinvadersand”stop9thebreakersofinteationalpeacethis
literarylpraeses,asrcial
advertisentforsilkstoofalongfivehundredwordessay,
beginninganchurianprovinceshavebeenlost”
thatdoesnotan,hoplendedtheir
literatureisfullofgeneralities,butitisnotsileratheronthentrary,frohis
hedgingabouttheprobleandthesevaguegeneralitiesofexpression,therehas
developed,strangetosay,theutstfinesseofexpressionthechinese,versedin
thisliterarytraining,haveleaedtoreadbethelines,anditistheforeigners3
inabilitytoreadbetissingthe
”aningbeyondthehatcausestheforeign
rrespondentstoselvesfortheirinabilitytokeheador
tailofsuchcleverlylesspublicstatents
fortheincingwordslargelydue,aswehaveseen,
tothenosyllabiccharacteroftheliterarylanguage梐ndis
ihevictoryinapoliticalorlegal
strugglechinesecivilof
exsthepublicassiduouslyreadthisexchangeofabusivenessor
ofpoliterecrinationsorevenbrazenfacedlies,anddecideter
literarystyle,inousclo
... </P></TD>